flare
Manage Flare error tracking and performance monitoring using the flare CLI. Use when the user wants to list, triage, resolve, snooze, or debug errors; manage projects; create projects and retrieve API keys; check error counts; investigate slow routes, queries, jobs, or commands; view aggregated performance data and traces; or interact with flareapp.io from the command line.
68
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that comprehensively covers specific capabilities, includes a thorough 'Use when...' clause with numerous natural trigger terms, and is clearly distinguishable from other skills due to its focus on the Flare platform. It uses proper third-person voice and avoids vague language or buzzwords. The description is thorough without being unnecessarily verbose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: list, triage, resolve, snooze, debug errors; manage projects; create projects; retrieve API keys; check error counts; investigate slow routes, queries, jobs, commands; view performance data and traces. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (manage Flare error tracking and performance monitoring using the flare CLI) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause listing numerous specific trigger scenarios like listing errors, triaging, resolving, investigating slow routes, etc.). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'error tracking', 'performance monitoring', 'flare CLI', 'triage', 'resolve', 'snooze', 'debug errors', 'API keys', 'slow routes', 'slow queries', 'traces', 'flareapp.io', 'error counts'. These are terms a user would naturally use when needing this skill. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with clear niche: specifically targets the Flare error tracking platform (flareapp.io) and its CLI tool. The combination of 'flare CLI', 'flareapp.io', and specific actions like 'snooze errors' and 'investigate slow routes' makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, highly actionable CLI reference skill with excellent concrete examples and copy-paste ready commands. Its main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (the output format section and some explanatory text could be trimmed), and workflows that lack explicit validation/verification steps. The progressive disclosure structure references external files but the main file still contains a lot of inline content that could be offloaded.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps to workflows — e.g., after resolving an error, show how to verify the status changed by re-fetching it; after creating a project, show how to confirm it exists and retrieve the API key.
Move the detailed command reference (User & team, Projects, Errors, Error actions, Occurrences, Performance monitoring, Pagination sections) into references/commands.md and keep only the 5-6 most common commands inline in SKILL.md.
Trim the Output format section to a concise bullet list or move it to a separate reference file — Claude can infer most formatting conventions from a brief directive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., the prerequisites section explaining how to check PATH, the authentication section explaining what a 401 error means). The output format section is somewhat verbose with formatting guidance Claude could infer. However, the command reference sections are lean and well-structured. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Excellent actionability throughout — every section provides copy-paste ready CLI commands with realistic parameters. The commands include specific flags, filter syntax, sort options, and field parameters. The workflows section provides numbered step sequences with concrete commands. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are listed with clear sequences and numbered steps, but lack explicit validation checkpoints. For example, the 'Create a project and get API keys' workflow says 'verify errors are flowing' but doesn't show how. The error triage workflow doesn't include verification that resolves/snoozes succeeded. The debug workflow has a vague step 2-4 that breaks from the concrete command pattern. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references external files (references/commands.md, references/workflows.md) which is good progressive disclosure design, but no bundle files were provided to verify these exist. The main file itself is quite long (~180 lines of content) and could benefit from moving the full command reference to the referenced commands.md, keeping only the most common commands inline. The output format section could also be a separate reference. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- freekmurze/dotfiles
- Commit
3974caa
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.