Review and merge GitHub pull requests for Spatie packages. Use when asked to review a PR, review a pull request, merge a PR, or when given a GitHub PR URL to review. Also triggers on 'review this PR,' 'check this pull request,' 'merge this,' or '/review-pr'. Uses gh CLI for all GitHub operations.
100
Quality
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly specifies the domain (Spatie packages), concrete actions (review and merge PRs), provides comprehensive trigger terms covering natural user language variations, and explicitly states when to use it. The mention of gh CLI adds technical specificity that aids in skill selection.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple concrete actions: 'Review and merge GitHub pull requests for Spatie packages' and specifies the tool used 'Uses gh CLI for all GitHub operations'. Clear domain (Spatie packages) and specific operations (review, merge). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Review and merge GitHub pull requests for Spatie packages') and when ('Use when asked to review a PR, review a pull request, merge a PR...') with explicit trigger guidance including specific phrases and commands. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms: 'review a PR', 'review a pull request', 'merge a PR', 'GitHub PR URL', 'review this PR', 'check this pull request', 'merge this', '/review-pr'. Includes both formal and casual variations users would naturally say. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with clear niche: specifically for Spatie packages, GitHub PRs, and uses gh CLI. The combination of 'Spatie packages' + 'PR review/merge' + specific trigger terms makes it unlikely to conflict with general code review or other GitHub skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality skill that efficiently guides Claude through PR review and release workflows. It provides concrete, executable commands with clear validation checkpoints and explicit safety guardrails (especially around major version bumps). The structure is clean and appropriately scoped for the task complexity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence with gh CLI and PR review concepts. No unnecessary explanations of what PRs are or how GitHub works. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable gh CLI commands throughout, with specific flags and JSON fields to use. Copy-paste ready commands for every step of the workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (CI must be green, review issues trigger stop, major version requires user approval). Includes decision points and error recovery paths. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections and subsections. Content is appropriately sized for a single SKILL.md file (~50 lines) with no need for external references. Versioning rules are logically grouped. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
355d067
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.