Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, high-signal composition skill: it defines the order of operations, locks the backend/frontend contract in a compact table, and ends with executable verification plus a checklist. The only softness is that executable detail lives in the composed skills rather than here, which is by design.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries kit-specific knowledge — route conventions, the camelCase-body vs PascalCase-query-param rule, permission mirroring — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; it fits the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete paths ("Modules.{X}.Contracts/v1/{Area}/", "lib/permissions.ts"), naming rules, and an executable verify block make the guidance mostly copy-paste ready, but the actual code details are delegated to add-feature/add-react-page, leaving minor gaps versus fully complete examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five ordered steps include explicit checkpoints — "Build + test backend green", "Lock the contract", "dotnet build ... && dotnet test", "npm run lint && npm run test:e2e" — plus a final checklist, matching the anchor with validation steps and checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~45 lines with well-organized sections (order of operations, contract table, verify, checklist) and no need for external reference files, the under-50-line exception applies; sibling-skill references are one level deep and clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |