Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-ceremony workflow documented with lean, executable templates, an explicit verification step, and a footgun callout. The only minor gap is progressive-disclosure structuring, which is limited by the absence of bundle files.
Suggestions
Add a one-line error-recovery hint to Step 7 (e.g. 'On build warnings or test failure, fix and re-run before proceeding') to make the feedback loop explicit rather than implied.
Consider extracting the load-order list and the Step 6 registration edits into a references/ file so the overview stays a pure checklist pointer, improving progressive disclosure.
Verify the referenced rule files (.agents/rules/architecture.md, .agents/rules/eventing.md) exist in the bundle and surface them under a named References section for clearer navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout — it assumes Claude knows C#/ASP.NET and never pads with concept explanations; every annotation (e.g. 'MUST be last — applies tenant + soft-delete filters') is load-bearing rather than filler. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready C# templates, exact dotnet sln commands, and concrete file paths with a consistent {Name} placeholder convention covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence culminating in an explicit Verify step (build with '0 warnings', Architecture.Tests, full test run) and a closing checklist, with the Step 6 footgun calling out silent failure modes for the riskiest part. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (.agents/rules/architecture.md, .agents/rules/eventing.md, and the create-migration skill), but no bundle files exist and most detail is inline, so it is good rather than exemplary in cross-file structuring. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |