Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, actionable procedural skill with strong sequencing, explicit validation, and error-recovery guidance; its only real gaps are minor deferral of command selection to a sibling skill and a slightly monolithic structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and purposeful with code blocks, a table, and rules that earn their place; minor over-explanation (e.g., the rebase ours/theirs reminder and 'stale artifact from two independently valid histories') keeps it just below the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands covering the common cases (git diff --diff-filter=U, ./frb_internal precommit-generate, generate-internal-frb-example-pure-dart, checkout --ours), but defers the core 'minimal regeneration command' selection to the frb-code-generation skill, a minor self-containedness gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow (Before Starting, Classify, Generated File Conflict Workflow, Validation, Commit Shape) with an explicit validation section, ordering rules, and error-recovery guidance ('Do not stop after the internal generator when CI errors mention missing methods ... run package codegen after'), plus a CI feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to sibling skills (frb-code-generation, frb-fix-ci); no bundle files exist, and the ~100-line procedural content is appropriately inline, but it is a single monolithic file with no content split, so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |