Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An instruction-focused skill with concrete, near copy-paste-ready templates for both artifacts and crisp, imperative update rules. Its main gaps are the lack of any verification checkpoint after writing the two files and a slightly malformed nested code fence in the UML.md structure template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — it never explains what UML, Mermaid, or HTML are, and templates carry the weight — but the ~8 lines of hand-specified CSS and rules restating template comments ("Copy the raw Mermaid source (no backtick fences)") could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is nearly fully executable: an exact section template, a complete copy-paste UML.html with a CDN Mermaid import, and a concrete creation procedure ("surveying the repo (entry points, top-level directories, exported types)"). The malformed nested code fence in the markdown structure example ("` ``") is a minor gap that keeps it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The update rules form a clear numbered sequence with a pre-flight checkpoint ("Read before write... so you preserve hand-edited notes"), but there is no post-write verification loop (e.g. confirming UML.html stayed in sync or the Mermaid renders) — a minor validation gap, not the absent-validation case that would cap at 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers, no nested references, and at ~150 lines the inline content is mostly appropriate; the ~60-line HTML template is a plausible candidate for an assets/ file, leaving a minor organization gap rather than the clean split of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |