CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

daily-task-manager

Task lifecycle management with stable task IDs. Add, complete, defer, remove, and review tasks with deterministic action routing and fail-closed ambiguity handling. Maintains a running task list as a brain page.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/daily-task-manager/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, highly actionable operational spec with a clear validated workflow and well-organized sections; its only soft spots are mild redundancy between Phases, Anti-Patterns, and Design Rationale, and the absence of any progressive-disclosure split (which is appropriate here given the self-contained content).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and operational, never explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Anti-Patterns and Design Rationale sections partially restate the Phases rules, so it is efficient with minor instances that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides exact tool calls (get_page/put_page with 'ops/tasks.md'), the t-YYYYMMDD-NN ID scheme, a copy-paste-ready persisted page template, a concrete action-routing table, and a structured return object — fully executable guidance covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Load→Validate→Identify→Execute→Save sequence has explicit validation checkpoints (fail-closed not_found/ambiguous with no mutation, ONE clarification before mutating, explicit confirmation for destructive remove, re-get_page before put_page on races), plus Edge Cases and an Anti-Patterns checklist.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is a single self-contained file with clean, navigable section headers; all content is appropriately inline with nothing that clearly belongs in a separate file, fitting the 'good structure; most content appropriately placed' anchor rather than the reference-split 5.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, clearly conveying what the skill does across the task lifecycle, but it omits any 'Use when...' trigger guidance and lacks the natural synonyms users would actually say, leaving the 'when' weak.

Suggestions

Append a 'Use when...' clause naming natural user phrases, e.g. 'Use when the user says add/remind me to/put X on my list, what's on my plate, or asks to complete/defer/remove a task.'

Include common synonyms and surface terms users actually say (e.g. 'to-do', 'on my plate', 'remind me') to broaden trigger coverage beyond the bare action verbs.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Add, complete, defer, remove, and review tasks' — covering the full task lifecycle comprehensively, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear ('Task lifecycle management with stable task IDs... Add, complete, defer, remove, and review tasks') but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance in the description, so completeness is capped at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Action verbs like 'add', 'complete', 'defer', 'review tasks' are present but it lacks the natural synonyms users actually say ('put X on my list', 'what's on my plate', 'remind me to'), matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'brain page' framing plus 'stable task IDs' and 'fail-closed ambiguity handling' carve a clear niche with only minor overlap risk against generic to-do/note skills, fitting the 'mostly distinct' anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
garrytan/gbrain
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.