CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

idea-lineage

Trace one idea's evolution through the brain: first mention, best articulation, related concepts, reversals, contradictions, abandoned branches, and the current live version. Use for single-idea conceptual lineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics.

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-built operational skill body: the phase workflow is precisely sequenced with disambiguation, handoff, and gap-labeling checkpoints, and the output format plus failure handling are copy-paste concrete. The minor costs are section-level redundancy (Tools Used, Related Skills, What this solves) and the absence of any bundled reference files to offload detail.

Suggestions

Trim or merge the 'Tools Used' section into the phase steps (it duplicates the frontmatter tools list) and collapse 'Related Skills and Operations' overlap with 'What this is not'.

Consider moving the seven-bucket classification definitions and the output-format template into a bundled reference file (e.g., references/lineage-buckets.md) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview, which would also make the external references verifiable within the bundle.

Trim the first paragraph of 'What this solves', which restates the frontmatter description almost verbatim.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The core sections (Phases, Output Format, Quality Rules, When it fails) are dense and every token earns its place, but 'What this solves' restates the description, 'Tools Used' duplicates the frontmatter tool list, and 'Related Skills' overlaps 'What this is not' — minor instances that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully concrete: exact tool per phase step (search, query, get_page, takes_search, find_contradictions), a copy-paste-ready output-format template, exact gap labels ('No clear evidence found', 'undated'), and specific error codes (page_not_found) with recovery actions.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Five clearly sequenced phases with explicit checkpoints: a disambiguation ask when multiple ideas share a phrase, a wrong-shape handoff to find_trajectory, gap labeling instead of fabricated narrative, and error-recovery feedback loops in 'When it fails'. The skill is read-only, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so all operational detail lives inline in a ~200-line body. The external references (../conventions/quality.md, ../conventions/agent-operator-protocol.md) are well-signaled and one level deep but point outside the skill directory and cannot be verified in this bundle — good structure with minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person, concrete, and comprehensive on what it produces, with an explicit use-for clause and explicit exclusions that distinguish it from concept-map synthesis and entity trajectories. The only weakness is that the most natural user phrasings live in the triggers frontmatter rather than the description text.

Suggestions

Fold one or two natural user phrasings from the triggers list (e.g., 'how has my thinking about X changed' or 'where did this idea come from') into the description so the trigger_term_quality coverage is complete within the description itself.

Consider mentioning the brain/notes corpus medium explicitly in the when-clause so users searching on 'my notes' or 'my brain' language also match.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates seven concrete lineage outputs — 'first mention, best articulation, related concepts, reversals, contradictions, abandoned branches, and the current live version' — comprehensive coverage of the domain with no evident gaps, matching the anchor-5 example's breadth.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Trace one idea's evolution through the brain: first mention...') and 'when' ('Use for single-idea conceptual lineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics'), with concrete scope and exclusions.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keywords ('trace', 'evolution', 'reversals', 'current live version', 'lineage'), but the most natural user phrasings like 'how has my thinking about X changed' or 'where did this idea come from' appear only in the frontmatter triggers list, not the description itself, so a few natural terms are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Use for single-idea conceptual lineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics' carves a clear niche and explicitly pre-empts the two nearest competing capabilities, minimizing conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 2 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

garrytan/gbrain

Path

skills/idea-lineage/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.