Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with strong workflow validation and progressive disclosure, but actionability is uneven: only Obsidian has executable commands while other sources rely on procedural steps without CLI syntax.
Suggestions
Add executable gbrain CLI commands for the other sources (Notion, CSV, JSON, Roam), mirroring the concrete 'gbrain extract links' example used for Obsidian.
Document actual command syntax for the tools listed in 'Tools Used' (get_page, get_stats, get_health, search) so the steps are copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Contract, sources table, Phases, Verification, Anti-Patterns, Output Format) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Only the Obsidian section gives an executable command ('gbrain extract links'); Notion, Logseq, CSV, JSON, and Roam are procedural instructions without command syntax, and 'Tools Used' lists tool names without CLI usage. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The batch migration has explicit validation checkpoints: a 5-10 file sample test before bulk import, a dedicated Verification section, and Anti-Patterns warning against skipping verification. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with no dead or nested references and well-organized sections; the concise overview (table + Phases) and brief per-source detail are appropriately inline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |