Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A disciplined, well-sequenced debugging workflow with strong validation checkpoints and actionable directives. It is token-efficient and easy to navigate, with only minor room to tighten repeated admonitions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean with tight, directive prose and minimal concept re-explanation, though a few repeated admonitions (the 3-strike / architectural-smell points restated across phases) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands ('git log --oneline -20 -- <affected-files>'), explicit decision branches, and a structured report template; it stops short of copy-paste code examples for verification, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-phase investigation pipeline with explicit validation checkpoints (hypothesis testing, 3-strike rule, fresh reproduction, regression test) and feedback loops for recovery, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed phases with no nested references and no external bundle files to manage; it stays inline throughout rather than splitting detail out, so it is good but not maximally structured. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |