CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gstack-openclaw-retro

Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware with per-person contributions, praise, and growth areas. Use when asked for weekly retro, what shipped this week, or engineering retrospective.

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

84%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete git commands and precise thresholds, organized into a clear multi-step workflow. It is mostly token-efficient and well-structured, with only minor conciseness and validation-loop gaps.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/retry step for Step 1 (e.g., if no commits in window or fetch fails, stop and report BLOCKED before computing metrics) to strengthen workflow feedback loops.

Consider offloading the long metric-list and per-step output-format details into a reference file to reduce inline length, since no bundle files currently exist.

Trim duplicated guidance between the per-step ASCII examples and the final 'Important Rules' / narrative sections to tighten token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean and action-oriented, but the 14-step structure with repeated example formatting (ASCII tables/histograms) and some restated rules adds length that could be trimmed; every token nearly earns its place.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready git commands covering the common cases, plus concrete metric definitions, thresholds (45-min session gap, 50+ LOC buckets), and exact output formats.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 14-step sequence with explicit per-step computation and output formats, plus completion-status codes; however validation checkpoints are light (BLOCKED/DONE_WITH_CONCERNS signal issues but no explicit retry loop for, e.g., missing git data).

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a logical top-to-bottom flow and no bundle files; good structure, though the entire skill is a single inlined document with no one-level-deep references that could offload the detailed metric reference.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, trigger-rich, complete, and clearly distinct. It names concrete capabilities and provides natural 'Use when' phrasing that directly matches user language.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics', 'per-person contributions, praise, and growth areas', 'persistent history and trend tracking' — with comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics...') and when ('Use when asked for weekly retro, what shipped this week, or engineering retrospective') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say — 'weekly retro', 'what shipped this week', 'engineering retrospective' — covering common synonyms and the conversational trigger directly.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche (weekly engineering retrospectives with team-aware per-person analysis) and distinct triggers that would not conflict with general git or code-review skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
garrytan/gstack
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.