Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable operational protocol: exact commands, error-code-specific handling, and gated workflows with real validation feedback loops. Its weaknesses are redundancy (repeated credential caveats and a duplicated discovery command block) and an over-dense Article Workflow paragraph, which cost conciseness and some organizational polish.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated providers/themes/prompts/layout 'show' command block (the 'Inspect specific resources only when the task needs them' section repeats the Discovery First bullets verbatim) and keep one canonical list.
Consolidate the MD2WECHAT_API_KEY requirement, currently stated four times across Configuration Boundaries and Publishing Side Effects, into a single credential-matrix bullet.
Split the run-on Article Workflow paragraph into short rule groups (inspect gate, preview semantics, convert effects, error handling) so each validation rule is scannable instead of buried mid-paragraph.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is imperative and free of concept explanations Claude already knows, but contains real duplication: the providers/themes/prompts/layout 'show' command block appears twice (once under 'Discovery First' bullet list, again verbatim as 'Inspect specific resources only when the task needs them'), the MD2WECHAT_API_KEY requirement is stated four separate times (Configuration Boundaries x3 and Publishing Side Effects), and the Article Workflow section packs many distinct rules into one run-on paragraph. This fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the level-4 'minor instances of over-explanation'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: exact CLI invocations with flags ('md2wechat inspect <article.md> --json', 'md2wechat layout validate --file <formatted.md> --json', '--body-file -' for stdin), concrete error codes with prescribed responses ('45004' → check digest/summary/description, 'CONFIG_INVALID' → do not retry, 'PREVIEW_ACTION_REQUIRED' → empty data.output_file is stale), and precise JSON paths to read ('data.readiness.targets', 'data.readiness.blockers'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The article workflow is an explicit numbered confirm-first sequence (inspect → preview → convert → effects only on request) with a hard validation gate: readiness targets/blockers must be checked before convert/upload/draft, and blocked targets stop the flow. The formatting protocol includes a validate step, and Failure Handling closes the loop with validate → inspect module → fix → re-validate, matching the anchor with feedback loops for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the body avoids nested or buried references, deferring tutorials to CLI-embedded workflows and project docs with clear section headers throughout. However, ~210 lines of dense routing protocol live entirely inline — fine-grained detail such as the minimax subject-reference model rules sits in the main body, and the duplicated discovery blocks show content that could be consolidated or split — so it lands at 'good structure, minor organization gaps' rather than the level-5 ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |