Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a context-pack transcript rather than an instructional skill document: it contains a valuable, unambiguous rule and concrete fix targets, but they are buried in four verbose log entries with repeated rule statements and archival metadata. Distilling the rule into a short actionable section and moving the incident history to reference files would substantially improve it.
Suggestions
Lead the body with a short '## Rule' section stating the api-client-vs-raw-fetch policy and the three-endpoint allowlist once, instead of repeating it across three separate entries.
Convert the implicit policy into an explicit workflow: check whether the endpoint exists in the generated SDK (sdk.gen.ts) → use the api-client typed function → fall back to raw fetch only for /health, /oauth2/token, /auth/register.
Move the archival incident/decision log entries with their CIDs, token counts, and timestamps into a references/ file (e.g., references/incident-log.md), keeping only the distilled rule and fix pointers in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The entries carry real, non-obvious information (root cause, deferred fix, leverage note), but the governing rule is restated verbatim three times across entries, and archival metadata ('CID', 'Compression: full', 'Tokens: 131/131', entry IDs, timestamps) pads every section. This sits between the 2 anchor ('several unnecessary explanations or padded sections') and the 4 anchor — informative but clearly could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance names exact functions and files: 'refactor entry-map.spec.ts seeding to createDiaryEntry, and the mcp-test-harness public-diary creation to createDiary, both via createClient({ baseUrl: restApiUrl }) with the bearer + x-moltnet-team-id headers', plus the explicit allowlist '/health, /oauth2/token, /auth/register'. It stops short of the 5 anchor because there is no complete executable code example or import statement to copy. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The governing rule is stated unambiguously ('e2e tests must use api-client for any endpoint in the generated spec; raw fetch is allowed ONLY for /health, /oauth2/token, /auth/register'), but it is embedded in incident narrative rather than presented as sequenced steps, and there are no checkpoints for verifying whether an endpoint is in the generated SDK. This fits the 3 anchor (sequence implicit, checkpoints missing) better than 2, since the rule itself leaves no ambiguity about what to do. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has consistent structure (### headers per entry, metadata blocks), but it inlines four full archival log entries — decisions, incidents, and a signed commit record — where a distilled rule in SKILL.md plus separate reference files for the log entries would be appropriate. No bundle files exist, so navigation is not an issue, but the organization fits the 3 anchor ('content that should be separate is inline') better than the 4 anchor's 'most content is appropriately placed'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |