Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, actionable troubleshooting skill with concrete commands, exact paths, and explicit safety guardrails around destructive operations. It is well-structured and leans on live docs for detail, with only minor room to tighten prose and add stronger validation feedback loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and product-specific (paths, commands, topology facts Claude would not know), with terse lists and minimal padding; a few procedural passages could still be tightened, keeping it just below the lean/efficient ceiling. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands ('paseo daemon status --json', 'paseo provider diagnostic <provider> --json'), exact file paths, UI navigation ('Settings → About'), and a health endpoint, with only minor conditional gaps in the procedural prose. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear multi-step sequence (fetch llms.txt → select page → fetch .md → answer; establish topology → diagnose → logs → escalate) with explicit guardrails for destructive actions ('Do not restart the daemon, edit config, update software, or expose a network listener without the user's explicit permission'), though full validate→fix→retry feedback loops are only weakly present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections and appropriately delegates detail to one-level-deep live documentation (llms.txt index, .md pages, GitHub/Discord) rather than inlining it; no bundle files are present or needed, with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |