Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured review skill: lean bullet formatting, concrete file paths, named environment variables, and explicit validation commands with no padding. The only gaps are a handful of vague guardrail items ('remain verified', 'when touched'), no guidance for handling validation failures, and one hedged command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is pure lean bullets — 'Review-only by default.', specific file paths, guardrail one-liners, and validation commands — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: concrete commands ('npm run build', 'npm run verify:portable', 'npx skill-check .agents/skills/mobilebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review') and env vars (MOBILEBUILDMCP_RESOURCE_ROOT, DYLD_FRAMEWORK_PATH). Not 5: a few items stay vague — 'Resource-root utilities when touched' names no files, 'AXe binary/framework expectations remain verified' says nothing about how to verify them, and 'npm run package:macos -- --help (if supported)' is uncertain guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The scope → files → guardrails → validation flow is clearly laid out with explicit validation commands, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. Not 5: there is no error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when a guardrail fails or validation errors) and one validation step is hedged with '(if supported)'; not 3 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed, and the four sections (Review scope, Files to inspect, Guardrails, Validation) are well-organized and easy to navigate — the simple-skill case where well-organized sections alone warrant a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |