Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Dense, high-signal, project-specific conventions with an executable skeleton and a clear decision-first workflow; almost nothing re-teaches what Claude already knows. Minor room to trim generic Postgres rationale and to split the field-norms detail into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean — it defers Django syntax, migrations, and outbox plumbing to other skills and assumes competence — but a few asides could be trimmed, e.g. the generic Postgres varchar/TOAST storage explanation justifying the max_length=256 guidance. Efficient but not quite "every token earns its place". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | A fully executable, copy-paste-ready skeleton with real imports and concrete conventions throughout: exact decorators and base classes (@cell_silo_model, DefaultFieldsModel, ReplicatedCellModel), a relocation-scope decision table, explicit FK typing rules with on_delete string values, and precise file paths. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered sequence — "decide all four" coupled decisions before writing fields, then a skeleton, then numbered post-design steps that route to sibling skills — with the runtime __relocation_scope__ check noted as a guard. It lacks an explicit validate-the-design checkpoint or feedback loop, so it does not reach the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointers to sibling skills (generate-migration, hybrid-cloud-outboxes, hybrid-cloud-rpc). However, the ~124-line body keeps convention detail inline that could be split into a reference file, so content is not "appropriately split" at the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |