Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent content: dense, actionable, and well-sequenced, with detail correctly pushed into two real one-level-deep reference files. No meaningful weaknesses found.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean imperative guidance with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line is directive, and the only near-redundancy (terminal-call protocol) is duplicated between body and output.md for enforcement, not padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: exact paths to read (.factory/CONTEXT.md, FACTORY.json validation.work.commands), a numbered TDD loop with fail-for-the-expected-reason confirmation, and an exact output template in references/output.md. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The contract → design → proving slices → finish → output sequence is explicit, with validation checkpoints (confirm the failing test's reason, prove the real artifact, focused-then-broad checks) and feedback loops (stop and redesign when the sketch fights, plan-conflict escalation path). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body holds only orchestration; both referenced files (references/playbooks.md, references/output.md) exist, are clearly signaled with markdown links, and are one level deep — an easy-to-navigate overview plus detail split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |