Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete templates and commands. The main gap is the lack of an explicit validation feedback loop for destructive/batch operations, which the rubric treats as material.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after the validation command: 'If `npm run plugin:validate` reports errors, fix them and re-run before proceeding to build and website:data.'
In the migration section, add a verify/retry checkpoint after moving and removing manifests, since removing the old manifest is destructive and not easily reversible.
Tighten explanatory sentences such as the materialization rationale to keep the body as lean as its templates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and free of generic concept explanations; content consists of repo-specific conventions, guardrails, and concrete templates. A few explanatory sentences ('Materialization resolves the IDs from the root extensions/ directory...') could be trimmed, but nothing qualifies as padding, so it sits above the anchor-3 'mostly efficient' example. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a complete copy-paste-ready plugin.json template with clearly marked placeholders, a concrete directory tree, sorted-path rules, and exact commands (npm run plugin:validate / build / website:data), covering the common cases per anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step workflow and migration steps have a clear sequence and include a validation command, but there is no explicit 'if validation fails, fix and re-run' feedback loop; for a skill that performs destructive moves (migration removes the old manifest) and batch edits to multiple plugin mappings, the rubric's feedback-loop guidance caps this at 3 rather than rewarding an implicit checkpoint. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well organized into clear sections (Required decisions, Files to create, Workflow, Existing extension migration) with no nested references and no content that clearly belongs in a separate file; absent the one-level-deep external references that define anchor 5, this fits anchor 4's 'good structure, most content appropriately placed'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |