CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

catch-up

Catch up on what you missed while away — meetings, decisions, action items, mentions, and important threads from a defined time window. Trigger phrases include "what did I miss", "catch me up", "I was out", "I'm back from PTO", "summarize while I was away", "what happened last week while I was off", "I just got back", "fill me in on what I missed".

66

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable workflow with clear phasing, concrete Glean commands, and a thorough vetting gate. The chief weakness is a dangling reference to a using-glean setup file that is absent from the bundle, plus minor redundancy between the Core Principles and Phase 3 sections.

Suggestions

Resolve the dangling 'using-glean/reference/' pointer: either add the referenced reference file or remove/inlines the setup guidance so no link is broken.

De-duplicate the skepticism/prioritization guidance between 'Core Principles' and 'Phase 3' to trim tokens without losing the emphasis.

Note tool availability assumptions explicitly (e.g., what to do when Glean tools are absent beyond the setup pointer) to strengthen actionability for hosts without Glean.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Efficient and free of basic-concept padding, using tight bullets, checklists, and templates; mild redundancy between 'Core Principles' and the Phase 3 vetting ('Be skeptical', 'Less is more' restated) is trimmable, keeping it just short of fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (chat '...', meeting_lookup '...', search '...') and a copy-paste report template with specific vetting criteria; minor gaps are the assumed Glean tool surface and placeholder tokens like [time period] the model must fill.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear four-phase sequence with an explicit critical vetting gate and a 'If Nothing Critical Happened' decision branch; as a read-only summarization skill it needs no destructive-operation loop, but it lacks the explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop that would reach 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Internal sections are well-organized and self-contained, but the body references 'the using-glean reference (using-glean/reference/)' for setup and no such file exists in the bundle — a dangling, broken reference that impedes clean navigation.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that answers both 'what' and 'when' with an explicit, comprehensive set of natural trigger phrases. The main gap is that the concrete actions Claude performs are described in the body rather than the frontmatter, leaving the description listing content categories more than actions.

Suggestions

Fold one or two concrete actions into the description (e.g., 'Gathers, vets, and prioritizes ...') so it states what Claude does, not just what it reports on.

Tighten the trigger-phrase list slightly (some near-duplicates) to keep the description lean while preserving synonym coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete content categories ('meetings, decisions, action items, mentions, and important threads'), but the verbs/actions Claude performs (gather, vet, prioritize, present) live in the body rather than the description, so coverage of concrete actions is not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what it does ('Catch up on what you missed while away ... from a defined time window') and explicitly states when to use it via concrete 'Trigger phrases include ...', satisfying both halves with concrete triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive coverage of natural user phrases with multiple synonyms — 'what did I miss', 'catch me up', 'I'm back from PTO', 'fill me in on what I missed', etc. — exactly what a user would say when needing this skill.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The post-absence / PTO-return niche is mostly distinct with specific triggers, but phrases like 'summarize while I was away' carry minor overlap risk with general summarization skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
gleanwork/claude-plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.