Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow with concrete tool commands, a vetting checklist, and copy-paste output templates. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from duplicated clarification questions and slight overlap between the principles list and the vetting table.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated clarification questions — keep them only in Phase 1 (or only in the intro) to trim ~4 lines of repetition.
Collapse the 'Core Principles' list into the Phase 3 vetting table, since 'quality over quantity', 'distinguish roles', and 'be skeptical' are already encoded there.
Consider splitting the large output markdown template (lines 77-124) into a referenced file to shorten the SKILL.md body and aid progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and free of concepts Claude already knows, but the clarification questions are repeated (once in the intro, once in Phase 1) and a few principles overlap with the vetting table, leaving minor trimming opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready Glean commands with example query strings, a vetting table with explicit criteria, and a full output markdown template covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-phase sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (the CRITICAL vetting phase), a self-check question, a vetting checklist table, and recovery paths for edge cases (no stakeholders, too many stakeholders, Glean unavailable). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed phases with no deeply nested references and no content that clearly belongs in a separate file; the single-file body is slightly long, which keeps it just shy of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |