Use Glean MCP tools to answer questions about company documents, internal wikis, policies, RFCs, design docs, people, teams, meetings, decisions, action items, email, calendar events, internal code, and the user's own work activity. Reach for this whenever the answer lives in enterprise systems rather than the local codebase or public web.
84
87%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
66%
1.50xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that excels at trigger term coverage, completeness, and distinctiveness. Its main weakness is that the core action is somewhat generic ('answer questions about') rather than listing multiple specific capabilities like searching, summarizing, or retrieving. Overall it would perform well in a multi-skill selection scenario.
Suggestions
Replace the generic 'answer questions about' with more specific actions such as 'Search, retrieve, and summarize content from company documents, internal wikis, policies...' to improve specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description names the domain (enterprise/company information) and lists many types of content it covers (documents, wikis, policies, RFCs, etc.), but the actual action is essentially just 'answer questions about' — it doesn't describe multiple distinct concrete actions like searching, summarizing, retrieving, or linking. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (answer questions about company documents, wikis, policies, etc. using Glean MCP tools) and 'when' ('Reach for this whenever the answer lives in enterprise systems rather than the local codebase or public web'), providing an explicit trigger clause with a clear boundary condition. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'company documents', 'internal wikis', 'policies', 'RFCs', 'design docs', 'people', 'teams', 'meetings', 'decisions', 'action items', 'email', 'calendar events', 'internal code', and 'work activity'. These are terms users would naturally use when seeking enterprise information. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description carves out a clear niche — enterprise/internal information via Glean MCP tools — and explicitly distinguishes itself from local codebase or public web skills. The mention of 'Glean MCP tools' and the boundary condition make it unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured routing/dispatch skill that efficiently maps user intents to Glean tools with clear cross-tool rules and excellent progressive disclosure. Its main weakness is the lack of concrete invocation examples in the body itself — all executable detail is deferred to reference files that weren't provided for evaluation. The decision tree format and cross-tool rules are strong, actionable patterns.
Suggestions
Add one brief example tool invocation (e.g., a `search` call with parameters) to make the SKILL.md itself more actionable without requiring reference file lookup for simple cases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It assumes Claude's competence, avoids explaining what Glean is or how MCP works, and every section serves a clear purpose: tool routing, cross-tool rules, and references. The decision tree table is an excellent space-efficient format. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The decision tree provides clear tool-to-intent mapping, and the cross-tool rules are concrete and specific. However, there are no executable code/command examples — no example tool invocations with actual parameters. The skill relies entirely on referenced files for the 'exact param shape' and filter syntax, so the SKILL.md itself doesn't give copy-paste-ready guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision tree provides an unambiguous routing workflow. The cross-tool rules serve as validation checkpoints (cite URLs, vet results, handle empty results). The instruction to open reference files before invoking unfamiliar tools is an explicit pre-flight check. For a routing/dispatch skill like this, the workflow is clear and well-sequenced. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure structure: the SKILL.md is a concise overview with a well-organized table linking to 12+ one-level-deep reference files. References are clearly signaled with both tool names and file paths. Cross-cutting concerns (synthesis, vetting) are separated into their own referenced files. Navigation is intuitive. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
39a5c99
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.