Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and highly actionable with executable commands and a clear prerequisite workflow, but progressive disclosure has a gap: the bundled references/citation.bib file is never navigated or signaled from the body.
Suggestions
Add a pointer to references/citation.bib in the References section (e.g., a 'Citation' entry) so the bundled reference file is discoverable from the body.
Distinguish bundle references from external URLs in the References section, or rename/relabel it to avoid the implication that only external links are referenced.
Optionally mention the citation file's purpose (e.g., cite Karczewski et al. 2020 when reporting gnomAD results) so its inclusion is justified.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no concept explanations (no 'what is gnomAD' padding), compact command blocks, and terse argument notes; it assumes Claude's competence and every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable `uv run scripts/...` commands with by-variant-ID, by-rsID, region, and gene forms, plus concrete output field names (pli, oe_lof_upper, faf95/faf99) — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Prerequisites are sequenced (uv setup then license notification) with an explicit condition-then-action checkpoint for the license file, and the querying tasks are single-action scripts that are unambiguous per the simple-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scripts are well-signaled via absolute-path instructions, but the bundle file references/citation.bib is not referenced anywhere in the body (the 'References' section lists only external URLs), leaving a provided reference undiscoverable. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |