Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, actionable API skill with excellent code examples, clear multi-step workflows, and well-structured progressive disclosure; the main weakness is conceptual prose explaining biology Claude largely already knows.
Suggestions
Trim the 'InterPro Entry Types' definitions and the InterPro-N 'panoptic segmentation' conceptual explanation to the minimum needed for correct usage, removing textbook biology Claude already knows.
Consider moving the inline per-endpoint parameter lists fully into references/api_reference.md, keeping SKILL.md to the high-level endpoint map and one example per endpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient actionable reference material, but it explains textbook biology Claude already knows (entry-type definitions like 'A group of proteins sharing a common evolutionary origin') and conceptual InterPro-N prose ('panoptic segmentation task, labeling residues') that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI invocations and Python snippets with concrete flags and arguments (e.g., the 4 endpoint constructions and IDA examples), copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are explicitly sequenced (the two-step ida_search then ida workflow) with a clear InterPro-N fallback feedback loop and an explicit 'NEVER iterate to count' validation rule. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real files (references/api_reference.md and references/example_responses.tsv) and a real scripts/interpro_client.py wrapper, with exhaustive detail appropriately split out. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |