Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear decision-tree workflow and real script references, but it repeats its key warning redundantly and leaves the citation.bib bundle file unreferenced.
Suggestions
Consolidate the three repeated local-filtering / narrow-date-range warnings into a single authoritative callout to save tokens.
Reference references/citation.bib from the body (e.g., in Prerequisites or a References section) so the bundle file is discoverable.
Consider moving the long bioRxiv/medRxiv category enumerations into a references file linked from the body to reduce inline bulk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the local-filtering anti-pattern is repeated three times (Search Strategy Guide, CRITICAL ANTI-PATTERN callout, and Core Rules), which could be consolidated. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready 'uv run scripts/...' commands with concrete examples and a complete required/optional argument list. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 'Read First' decision tree sequences the approach by input type, with a retry/backoff feedback loop, strict category validation, and an output-redirection checkpoint for verification. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The scripts are referenced and exist as real one-level-deep files, but references/citation.bib is a bundle file never signaled or linked from the body, leaving a navigation gap. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |