CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

literature-search-biorxiv

Browse, filter, and download life sciences, biology, and medical preprints from bioRxiv and medRxiv. Supports fetching paper metadata by DOI, and browsing by date range with category and keyword filters. Keyword filtering is local, so date ranges MUST be narrow (1-4 weeks) with a category to prevent timeouts.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/literature_search_biorxiv/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a clear decision-tree workflow and real script references, but it repeats its key warning redundantly and leaves the citation.bib bundle file unreferenced.

Suggestions

Consolidate the three repeated local-filtering / narrow-date-range warnings into a single authoritative callout to save tokens.

Reference references/citation.bib from the body (e.g., in Prerequisites or a References section) so the bundle file is discoverable.

Consider moving the long bioRxiv/medRxiv category enumerations into a references file linked from the body to reduce inline bulk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the local-filtering anti-pattern is repeated three times (Search Strategy Guide, CRITICAL ANTI-PATTERN callout, and Core Rules), which could be consolidated.

2 / 3

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready 'uv run scripts/...' commands with concrete examples and a complete required/optional argument list.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear 'Read First' decision tree sequences the approach by input type, with a retry/backoff feedback loop, strict category validation, and an output-redirection checkpoint for verification.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The scripts are referenced and exist as real one-level-deep files, but references/citation.bib is a bundle file never signaled or linked from the body, leaving a navigation gap.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and uses natural trigger terms, but lacks an explicit 'Use when' clause and slightly over-claims 'download' capability relative to what the skill actually supports.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause stating when Claude should reach for this skill (e.g., when the user wants bioRxiv/medRxiv preprint metadata or DOI lookups).

Soften or clarify 'download' to avoid implying full-text PDF downloads, which the body says are handled by the europepmc skill.

Reconcile the description's 'download preprints' language with the body's statement that PDF download is not supported.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Browse, filter, and download', 'fetching paper metadata by DOI', and 'browsing by date range with category and keyword filters' — matching the multi-action anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is clear but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2 rather than 3.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing terms 'bioRxiv', 'medRxiv', 'preprints', and 'life sciences, biology, and medical' are exactly what a user would say when needing this skill.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The bioRxiv/medRxiv niche is distinct, but the 'download ... preprints' framing risks triggering this skill for PDF-download requests that the body states it does not support, overlapping with the europepmc skill.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
google-deepmind/science-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.