Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable multi-step procedure that offloads templates to real reference files and includes a formatting feedback loop. Its main gaps are minor redundancy across patch paths, no pre-replace validation for destructive overwrites, and the absence of an explicit navigation overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean procedure with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy between Path A and Path B subsections keeps it just below fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout — exact header lines ("# Latest stable release: {{version}}"), specific URL transformation examples, and real template file paths — with only minor reliance on Claude generating summary text without an exact spec. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear decision-tree sequence (Path A/B, A.1/A.2, B.1/B.2) with a Finalize feedback loop (npm run format with retry on failure); the destructive "completely replace" steps lack a pre-replace validation checkpoint, a minor gap that holds it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Templates and examples are appropriately split into real one-level-deep reference files (highlights_examples.md, index_template.md, latest_template.md, preview_template.md), all clearly signaled inline; lacks a single overview/navigation summary, so it is just shy of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |