CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

greeter

A friendly greeter skill

68

2.17x
Quality

50%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

100%

2.17x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./packages/cli/src/commands/extensions/examples/skills/skills/greeter/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

0%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an extremely weak description that fails on all dimensions. It reads more like a label than a functional description, providing no concrete actions, no trigger terms, and no guidance on when Claude should select this skill. It is essentially unusable for skill selection among multiple options.

Suggestions

Describe specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Generates personalized greeting messages, welcome responses, and introductions.'

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user says hello, hi, greetings, or asks to be welcomed.'

Differentiate from other conversational skills by specifying the exact context or format of greetings this skill handles.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description contains no concrete actions whatsoever. 'A friendly greeter skill' is entirely abstract and vague, comparable to 'Helps with documents'.

1 / 3

Completeness

Neither 'what does this do' nor 'when should Claude use it' is answered. There is no 'Use when...' clause and no description of actual capabilities.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The only potential trigger term is 'greeter' which is not a natural keyword users would say. Users might say 'hello', 'hi', 'greeting', or 'introduce yourself' but none of these are present.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description is so vague that it's unclear what domain it belongs to. 'Friendly greeter' could overlap with any conversational or introductory skill and provides no distinct triggers.

1 / 3

Total

4

/

12

Passed

Implementation

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a minimal, single-purpose skill that does its job well. It is concise, unambiguous, and appropriately scoped for its simple task. No improvements are needed given the trivial nature of the skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is extremely brief and every token serves a purpose. No unnecessary explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

3 / 3

Actionability

The instruction is fully concrete and unambiguous: a specific trigger ('hello' or greeting request) maps to a specific, copy-paste-ready output string. No vagueness.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-action skill with no multi-step process. The single action (respond with a specific greeting) is completely unambiguous, so per the scoring notes for simple skills, this qualifies for a 3.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized and appropriately scoped. No additional structure or references are needed.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
google-gemini/gemini-cli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.