Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable, concise, and structured around explicit validated workflows. Its main gap is progressive disclosure: a complex multi-topic skill delivered as a single monolithic file rather than splitting detail into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the detailed domain-map IR schema and the side-effect membrane/extension rules into separate reference files (e.g. references/domain-map.md, references/side-effects.md) and link to them from the overview to apply progressive disclosure.
Consider extracting the modality reference (StitchToolClient config resolution, AI SDK adapter, toolMap) into a references/modality.md so the main SKILL.md stays a high-level map.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains basic concepts (MCP, codegen, ESM) and every section earns its place with concrete JSON/code; only minimal meta-prose in the intro keeps it from padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands ('bun scripts/capture-tools.ts', 'npx vitest run'), copy-paste TypeScript and JSON examples, and concrete file paths, matching the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Traffic Light (Red→Green→Yellow) flow and the 'Supporting a New Tool' / 'Adding a New Side-Effect Method' pipelines are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints ('validate-generated.ts', 'npx tsc'), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers, but everything lives inline in one ~340-line file with no bundle references; the domain-map IR and side-effect membrane detail are candidates for separate reference files, matching the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |