Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation feedback loops. Its only weakness is mild verbosity from repeated placeholder rationale and inline time-sensitive size limits.
Suggestions
State the ownership-placeholder rationale once (e.g., in step 6) and merely reference it from the field table and step 7 report to remove the triple repetition.
Move the 'as of writing' size-limit numbers out of the inline `large` rule — reference .github/policy.yml's recipe_size_limits instead — so version-specific figures don't penalize conciseness.
Condense the `description` draft rule: the 15-word / TODO-comment guidance appears in both the field table and the report-back step; define it once.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and free of concept-explanation fluff, but the ownership-placeholder rationale is repeated across the field table, step 6, and step 7, and the inline 'as of writing' size limits are time-sensitive numbers that could be tightened or referenced rather than embedded. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance: exact files to read, a copy-paste YAML template with literal placeholder strings, allowed enum options inline, and a concrete command 'uv run validate manifest <recipe-path>'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation feedback loop in step 6 ('fix these in the manifest and re-validate until they are gone') and a distinction between real schema errors and expected placeholder failures. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed (the schema is read live at runtime); the body is well-organized into clearly signaled, one-level sections with no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |