Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill with an explicit test-then-create workflow, validation checkpoints, and a feedback loop. It is held back only by placeholder args in the tool examples and a few sentences that could be trimmed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and every section earns its place; the isolation-model bullets are dense but convey tool-specific safety constraints rather than generic Claude knowledge. Not a 5 because a few sentences (e.g. the long headless-approvals bullet) could be tightened; not a 3 because there is no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable tool calls with real signatures — 'routine(action="create", name=..., schedule=..., task=..., secrets=[...])', 'routine(action="test", ...)' — plus a concrete cron example ('"0 8 * * *" = daily 08:00 UTC'). Not a 5 because the examples use placeholder args (name=...) rather than a fully fleshed end-to-end example covering a common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence — author, dry-run/test, read output, fix and re-test, then create, then await user confirmation — with explicit validation (the test's {success, status, output}) and a feedback loop ('fix task/secrets and test again'). Not a 4 because validation checkpoints and the error-recovery loop are explicit, not merely implied. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained single-file skill (~60 lines) with no bundle files and no need for external references, organized into well-signaled sections (isolation model, authoring, testing, scheduling). Structure is clear and navigable; no nested or buried references. Matches the simple-skill exception for well-organized single-file content. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |