Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured, with executable commands and clear input-validation checkpoints. The main gap is the absence of an explicit post-run verification and error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit post-run verification step (e.g. confirm the expected files exist under <OUTPUT_DIRECTORY>/<RECIPE_NAME>) and an error-recovery branch in case the scaffold script fails.
Tighten the vertical-skill aside or move it to a brief one-line boundary note to reduce token weight on an off-path concern.
Reconcile the script path: the intro references scripts/scaffold.py while the Run command uses .agents/skills/scaffold-python-recipe/scripts/scaffold.py — pick one consistent path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and sectioned, assuming Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; minor digressions (e.g. the vertical-skill shape enumeration) could be trimmed, placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a fully executable, copy-paste-ready command with its two exact flags, input-validation rules, and concrete quick-start commands (uv sync, uv run pytest, uv run adk run app), matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Inputs -> Run -> Respond sequence with explicit pre-flight validation checkpoints (name rules, ask for missing output dir, "do not proceed until confirmed"), but lacks a post-run verification step and an error-recovery feedback loop, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Rules, Inputs, Run, and Respond sections, references a real bundle file (scripts/scaffold.py) one level deep, and qualifies for the simple-skill exception, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |