secops-setup-gemini
Helps the user configure the Google SecOps Remote MCP Server for Gemini CLI. Use this when the user asks to "set up" or "configure" the security tools for Gemini CLI.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:google/mcp-security --skill secops-setup-gemini84
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description has good completeness with explicit 'Use when' triggers and is highly distinctive due to its specific product focus. However, it lacks concrete action details beyond 'configure' and could benefit from additional trigger term variations that users might naturally use.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions like 'create configuration files, set authentication credentials, validate server connections' to improve specificity.
Expand trigger terms to include variations like 'install', 'connect', 'MCP setup', 'SecOps integration', or 'Google security configuration'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Google SecOps Remote MCP Server, Gemini CLI) and the general action (configure), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like 'create config files', 'set API keys', or 'validate connections'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (configure Google SecOps Remote MCP Server for Gemini CLI) and when (when user asks to 'set up' or 'configure' security tools for Gemini CLI) with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some natural keywords ('set up', 'configure', 'security tools', 'Gemini CLI') but misses common variations users might say like 'install', 'connect', 'SecOps setup', 'MCP configuration', or 'Google security'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche targeting Google SecOps Remote MCP Server with Gemini CLI - unlikely to conflict with other skills due to the specific product combination mentioned. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured configuration skill that is concise and highly actionable with copy-paste ready commands and JSON. The main weakness is the lack of error handling guidance in the verification step - if the test command fails, the user has no troubleshooting path.
Suggestions
Add troubleshooting guidance after the verification step (e.g., 'If this fails, check: 1) gcloud auth status, 2) project ID spelling, 3) customer ID format')
Include a validation checkpoint after the config.json edit (e.g., 'Verify JSON syntax: `cat ~/.gemini/config.json | jq .`')
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, providing only necessary configuration steps without explaining what Google SecOps is or how MCP servers work. Every section serves a clear purpose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (curl, gcloud, gemini) and copy-paste ready JSON configuration. All steps are concrete with specific file paths and exact syntax. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (prerequisites → configuration → verification), but lacks explicit validation checkpoints between steps. No guidance on what to do if the verification command fails or how to diagnose common errors. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, single-purpose configuration skill under 50 lines, the content is well-organized with clear sections. No need for external file references given the scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.