persona-it-admin
Administer IT — monitor security and configure Workspace.
47
35%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/persona-it-admin/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is too terse and lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...'), making it difficult for Claude to reliably select this skill from a large pool. While it names a domain and two actions, the actions are high-level and the trigger terms are insufficient to cover natural user language variations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'Google Workspace', 'admin console', 'user permissions', 'security alerts', 'IT administration'.
Expand the capability list with more specific actions, e.g., 'manage user accounts, set security policies, configure groups, review audit logs, manage device access'.
Clarify what 'Workspace' refers to (e.g., 'Google Workspace') to reduce ambiguity and improve distinctiveness from other IT-related skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain ('IT', 'Workspace') and two actions ('monitor security', 'configure Workspace'), but these are still fairly high-level and not comprehensive — no specific concrete sub-actions like 'manage user accounts', 'set access policies', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Provides a brief 'what' (monitor security, configure Workspace) but has no explicit 'when' clause or trigger guidance. Per the rubric, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also quite thin, so this scores a 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords like 'IT', 'security', and 'Workspace', but misses many natural variations users might say such as 'Google Workspace', 'admin console', 'user management', 'permissions', 'audit logs', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 'Workspace' adds some specificity, but 'IT' and 'security' are broad terms that could overlap with many other skills related to security monitoring, network administration, or general IT support. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
37%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is extremely concise but at the cost of actionability and workflow clarity. The instructions read more like a high-level job description than concrete, executable guidance. It lacks specific commands, API calls, validation steps, or examples that would enable Claude to actually perform IT administration tasks.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable commands or API calls for each instruction (e.g., specific gws commands to review audit logs, check suspicious logins, and configure Drive sharing policies).
Define a clear multi-step workflow for common IT admin tasks with validation checkpoints, especially for security-sensitive operations like changing sharing policies.
Include at least one concrete example showing input and expected output for a typical IT admin task (e.g., reviewing audit logs and flagging suspicious activity).
Specify what 'suspicious login activity' means concretely — thresholds, patterns, or specific log fields to check.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations. Every line serves a purpose and assumes Claude's competence as an IT administrator. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The instructions are vague and abstract — 'monitor suspicious login activity,' 'configure Drive sharing policies,' and 'review audit logs' provide no concrete commands, code, or specific steps to execute. There are no executable examples or copy-paste ready commands beyond referencing workflow names. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no clear multi-step workflow with sequencing or validation checkpoints. The instructions are a loose list of tasks without defined order, dependencies, or feedback loops for potentially destructive operations like configuring sharing policies. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references prerequisite utility skills and a workflow, providing some structure and navigation. However, the references are not clearly signaled with links or descriptions of what each contains, and the main content itself is too thin to justify the split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- googleworkspace/cli
- Commit
c7c6646
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.