Move a Google Calendar event to a new time and automatically notify all attendees.
81
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/recipe-reschedule-meeting/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is specific about what it does and targets a clear niche, making it distinctive. However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which is critical for Claude to know when to select this skill. It also misses common trigger terms like 'reschedule', 'meeting', or 'change time' that users would naturally use.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to reschedule, move, or change the time of a Google Calendar event.'
Include common trigger term variations such as 'reschedule', 'meeting', 'calendar invite', 'change time', 'update event time' to improve matching with natural user language.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description lists specific concrete actions: 'Move a Google Calendar event to a new time' and 'automatically notify all attendees.' These are clear, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is clearly stated (move a calendar event and notify attendees), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, this caps completeness at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural terms like 'Google Calendar', 'event', 'new time', and 'attendees', but misses common variations users might say such as 'reschedule', 'meeting', 'calendar invite', or 'change time'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description targets a very specific niche—moving Google Calendar events with attendee notification—which is unlikely to conflict with other skills. The combination of Google Calendar + moving events + attendee notification is highly distinctive. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a concise, actionable recipe-style skill that provides executable commands for rescheduling a Google Calendar event. Its main weakness is the lack of a verification step after the patch operation—given that this affects all attendees (a semi-destructive/impactful action), confirming the update succeeded would strengthen the workflow.
Suggestions
Add a verification step after the patch command, e.g., re-fetching the event to confirm the new time was applied: `gws calendar events get --params '{"calendarId": "primary", "eventId": "EVENT_ID"}'` and checking the start/end times.
Add brief error recovery guidance, e.g., what to do if the patch fails (check eventId, verify calendar permissions, retry).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Very lean and efficient. The prerequisite note is necessary, the description is one line, and the steps are concrete commands with no unnecessary explanation of what Google Calendar is or how APIs work. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste ready CLI commands for each step with specific flags and JSON payloads. The example includes concrete parameter structures including sendUpdates, timeZone, and date formats. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (find → get details → update), but there's no validation checkpoint after the patch operation (e.g., verify the event was updated correctly, confirm attendees were notified) and no error recovery guidance for a potentially disruptive operation (rescheduling affects all attendees). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines, the content is well-organized with a clear prerequisite callout, a brief description, and a concise numbered workflow. No need for external references given the scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
c7c6646
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.