Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a concise, well-structured recipe that clearly outlines the workflow for saving a Gmail message to Google Docs. Its main weaknesses are the lack of guidance on passing data between steps (extracting MSG_ID from step 1's output, extracting email body from step 2's output) and the absence of any validation or error handling checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add brief notes on how to extract MSG_ID from the list response and DOC_ID from the create response to chain the steps together.
Add a validation step after step 1 (e.g., 'Verify the message was found before proceeding') and after step 4 (e.g., 'Confirm the doc content was written successfully').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient. The prerequisite note is necessary, and every line serves a purpose with no unnecessary explanation of what Gmail or Google Docs are. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and specific, but they use placeholders like MSG_ID, DOC_ID, and [EMAIL BODY] without explaining how to extract and pass these values between steps. The email body extraction from the JSON response and insertion into the next command is left implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced and numbered, but there are no validation checkpoints—no verification that the message was found, that the doc was created successfully, or that the content was written correctly. There's also no error handling guidance if the search returns no results. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, short skill under 50 lines, the structure is appropriate. It references prerequisite skills clearly and keeps the content well-organized without needing external files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |