Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, concise, and highly actionable instruction set with clear sequencing and sensible error fallbacks. Its main weakness is the underspecified feature-name generation step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and free of concept over-explanation, with only minor trimmable phrasing (e.g., 'Ask as many questions as needed; do not fill in gaps with your own assumptions'), landing between anchors 4 and 5 at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: exact template paths, explicit placeholder replacements, and specific file writes; the only gap is the unspecified feature-name generation algorithm, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Execution steps are a clearly numbered 1-5 sequence with conditional checkpoints (brief exists, uniqueness conflict) and a Safety & Fallback section for error recovery; this is not a destructive/batch operation so the cap does not apply, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections (Core Task, Execution Steps, Constraints, Output, Safety), meeting the simple-skill exception for anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |