Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with an explicit validation workflow and escalation paths. As an instruction skill it correctly omits code, and its clarity is high; the only minor gains are tighter phrasing and possibly externalizing the rationalizations table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what verification or tests are); the brief <background_information> block and some repeated phrasing in Claim-Specific Rules are minor trims that could be made, so just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: a 7-step gate function, per-claim-type requirement lists, and a copy-paste output template; since validation commands are intentionally discovered by the controller rather than specified, it stops just short of fully copy-paste-ready instructions. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced gate (identify claim → identify proving command → require fresh evidence → check exit code/failures/skipped/coverage → reject over-broad claims → escalate → allow) with explicit validation checkpoints and escalation/feedback loops via NOT_VERIFIED and MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers (When to Use, Inputs, Outputs, Gate Function, Claim-Specific Rules, Stop/Escalate, Rationalizations, Output Format) and no nested references; at ~125 lines with no bundle files to split into, it sits just below the one-level-deep reference ideal of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |