Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured reference covering Dialog and toast APIs with concrete return semantics and an executable example. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding, with only minor gaps in full actionability and no need for external references.
Suggestions
Add a short executable Dialog example (e.g. await Dialog.confirm(...)) to make all sections copy-paste ready.
Trim the subjective aside '尽量不要使用此函数，推荐使用下面的 toast.success() 等方法' to a concise directive.
If the component set grows, move per-method API detail into a references/ file and keep SKILL.md as an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and focused: each function gets a one-line behavioral description plus one executable code example for toast.promise, with only minor commentary (e.g. '尽量不要使用此函数') that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Most entries are concrete and usable — return types, resolve/reject semantics, and a copy-paste toast.promise example — but Dialog usage lacks an executable code snippet, leaving a minor gap versus fully copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose reference skill with no multi-step or destructive workflow, so the per-skill exception applies; the single action (show a Dialog/toast) is unambiguous and well-organized, though there are no validation checkpoints because none are needed. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized under per-component section headers (Dialog, toast) within a single short file, with no bundle files to reference; under-50-line simple-skill exception supports a high score, docked one point only because the inline toast.promise example could conceptually live in a reference file if the skill grew. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |