Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-honed diagnostic skill body: a concrete 8-step workflow, an unusually specific symptom-check checklist, exact report structure and tooling commands, and sound safety guidance (redaction, disposable reproduction). The remaining gaps are the oversized inline OIDC-consent bullet, a hedged validation step, and the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Move the OIDC consent 403 / ERR_ABORTED deep-dive (Symptom Checks) into the already-referenced oidc-provider.md or oidc-conformance.md reference, leaving a two-line symptom entry with the link in SKILL.md.
Name the concrete validation commands in step 6 (e.g., the exact caddy adapt command and the focused go test invocation) instead of the conditional 'Use Caddy adaptation or focused Go tests when local context supports it'.
Add an explicit feedback loop after validation (e.g., 'If adaptation or tests fail, reconcile the config against the parser fixtures and re-validate before reporting') to complete the workflow's error-recovery path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious domain specifics (sandbox_secret, /beacon vs /whoami semantics, net::ERR_ABORTED, form-action source lists) and explains nothing Claude already knows, but the ~15-line inline OIDC-consent bullet and a few long Symptom Checks entries could be tightened or split out, keeping it short of 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: copy-paste commands (caddy version, caddy list-modules --versions | rg '(auth|security)'), an exact report filename pattern, the issue-template path, and a full section skeleton for the report. The minor gap is step 6's conditional validation guidance ('Use Caddy adaptation or focused Go tests when local context supports it') which names no concrete command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-step sequence with an explicit validation step (step 6), a symptom-to-check recovery checklist, and acceptance criteria. It falls short of a 5 because there is no explicit validate-fail-fix-re-validate feedback loop and step 6 hedges on which validation command to run. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled, one-level-deep links to sibling skills (configuration, testing-and-ci, coding-directives, and the OIDC provider/conformance references). However, deep detail such as the OIDC consent Origin/Referrer-Policy troubleshooting is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into a referenced file, and the skill ships no bundle references of its own. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |