CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

docs

Decide which family a doc belongs to before drafting — SDK/developer, user/product, or working-group (WG) — since family sets the audience, home, and tone. Use when creating, moving, or restructuring docs, when unsure which directory a doc belongs in, or when a request says "document this" / "write docs for X" without naming the kind. Routes to the specialized skill for each family.

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured routing skill: it gives an actionable ordered decision procedure, concrete directory placement, and clean one-level-deep navigation to specialized skills. Its main weakness is token efficiency — sibling-skill links and conceptual framing are repeated across several sections.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the sibling-skill references: list each governing skill (docs-wg, docs-canvas, seo, docs-svg-kit, links, grounding) once in a single Related-skills section and reference it by name elsewhere rather than re-linking it in the table, routing steps, and boundaries bullets.

Trim persuasive framing such as "the most common and most expensive docs mistake" and "the boundaries are real, not bureaucratic"; state the boundary rules directly without the justifying prose.

Consider collapsing the three-families table's Governing-skill column into the Related-skills section to remove one more repetition of the same links.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient but could be tightened: the same sibling-skill links (docs-wg, docs-canvas, seo, docs-svg-kit, AGENTS.md) recur across the table, routing, boundaries, and related-skills sections, and persuasive prose ("most common and most expensive docs mistake," "boundaries are real, not bureaucratic") pads rather than instructs. It is not a 3 because not every token earns its place; it is not a 1 because the core routing guidance is direct and free of concept explanations Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides a concrete ordered decision procedure ("Ask, in order:" 1–3) with explicit directory homes (packages/<pkg>/docs/, docs/reference/**) and explicit handoff targets, and the SDK guidance gives concrete directives (example-dense, mark experimental surfaces). As an instruction-only routing skill, the absence of code is not penalized and the guidance is copy-paste-ready for classification and handoff.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The routing decision is a clear, unambiguous three-step ordered procedure with explicit branching outcomes per family. No validation feedback loop is required because the operation is classification/routing, not a destructive or batch operation that the rubric would cap at 2.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections (families table, routing, SDK docs, related skills), and all references to sibling skills and docs/AGENTS.md are one level deep and clearly signaled as navigation, with no nested or buried references.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, specific, and complete: it states the skill's routing purpose, names the three doc families, and gives an explicit "Use when" trigger with natural phrasing. It uses third-person imperative voice throughout with no over-claims or fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — "Decide which family a doc belongs to," "Routes to the specialized skill" — and enumerates the three families (SDK/developer, user/product, WG), matching the score-3 anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (classify family, route to specialized skill) and when via an explicit "Use when…" clause with concrete triggering situations, satisfying the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would actually say — "creating, moving, or restructuring docs," "which directory a doc belongs in," "document this" / "write docs for X" — giving good coverage of common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear routing niche with distinct triggers and explicitly delegates to specialized sibling skills, making conflict with those siblings unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 19 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
gridaco/grida
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.