Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers concrete, executable guidance for authoring and editing `.canvas` bundles with clear workflows and validation guards, all tightly scoped to the single task with no external references needed. Minor improvements are possible in tightening the presentation section and adding an explicit manifest-edit feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for manifest edits (e.g., re-read `.canvas.json`, apply edits, then re-read to confirm no field was dropped before relying on it).
Tighten the "Show the result" section into a short ordered checklist so the several presentation imperatives are sequenced rather than bulleted.
Reduce redundancy between the opening paragraph and the frontmatter description (the board-vs-slides point is stated twice).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept padding — tight bullets, an inline manifest example, and a specific shell command — but the opening paragraph reiterates the frontmatter's board-vs-slides point and the "Show the result" section restates some presentation guidance, leaving minor trimmable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance throughout (`read_file`/`write_file`/`edit_file`, `cp <scratch>/image-….png <board>.canvas/outputs/hero.png`, `surface_open` with `/poster.canvas`, full manifest JSON), covering the common cases with only minor gaps (no templated manifest-update code block, `surface_open` args prose-exemplified). | 4.5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequences for starting and updating a board with real validation checkpoints (re-read before editing to avoid clobbering; never open an empty or broken manifest), but the manifest-edit path lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop and the "Show the result" section is a dense unnumbered set of imperatives. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent) and the single-purpose skill is well-organized under clear section headers with no nested references; it sits just above the simple-skill threshold (~85 lines) with one dense section that could conceivably be referenced out, keeping it just below the top anchor. | 4.5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |