CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

coding-agents-hooks-authoring

To author, register, and test Rosetta hooks, add a SemanticKind, or debug a hook that won't fire.

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a dense, well-organized reference that assumes Claude's competence, provides executable paths and commands, sequences the multi-step SemanticKind workflow with validation, and stays within a single appropriately structured file. No significant weaknesses relative to the rubric.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient: no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line states a concrete rule, path, or failure mode, with line-numbered references that earn their place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance — exact file paths, line references (e.g. 'run-hook.ts:98'), a copy-pasteable sync command, and concrete regex patterns covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 'Adding a SemanticKind' section is a clearly numbered 4-step sequence with ordering rationale, a silent-drop failure mode called out, and validation via the regression test guard and the pre_commit sync step that provides a feedback loop.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files are present; the body is a single self-contained ~80-line file with well-organized section headers and a 'Reference files' list, which meets the simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, distinctive, and gives clear triggering situations, with concrete named actions rather than vague language. It would benefit from an explicit 'Use when...' clause and a few synonyms to push trigger quality to the top anchor.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' sentence (e.g. 'Use when authoring or registering Rosetta hooks, adding a SemanticKind, or debugging a hook that won't fire.') to reach the top completeness anchor.

Include a few natural synonyms or file extensions users might say (e.g. 'hooks.json', 'hooks.json.tmpl') to broaden trigger term coverage.

Keep the third-person voice consistent; it is correct here, so no change needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('author, register, and test Rosetta hooks', 'add a SemanticKind', 'debug a hook that won't fire') with comprehensive coverage of the skill's domain.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit and concrete, and the 'when' is conveyed through the OR-list of triggering situations, but there is no standalone 'Use when...' clause, which the guideline treats as slightly less explicit.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say ('debug a hook that won't fire', 'add a SemanticKind') but lacks synonyms or extension-style variations for broader keyword coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (Rosetta hooks, SemanticKind) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk against other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
griddynamics/rosetta
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.