CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

large-workspace-handling

To partition large workspaces (100+ files) into scoped subagent tasks when context is insufficient.

63

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-organized but reads as a structured checklist rather than an executable workflow: dispatch guidance is described instead of templated, and the verify step lacks an explicit validation/feedback loop. It is self-contained with no bundle references, which is fine but leaves no progressive-disclosure depth.

Suggestions

Add a copy-paste-ready subagent dispatch prompt template covering the required fields (scope paths, goal, context, inputs, output format, boundaries, constraints) instead of just listing the fields.

Turn the process into an explicit numbered workflow with a validation checkpoint after the verify pass (e.g. 'if verification finds gaps, re-dispatch to the failing scope and re-verify').

Move the detailed subagent output-structure and relevance-classification spec into a bundled reference file and link to it, keeping SKILL.md as an overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and dense — short bullets, no padding, and it assumes Claude's competence rather than explaining concepts it already knows — matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete guidance (dispatch fields, relevance classifications, task-type keywords, a tie-breaker) but the subagent-dispatch instructions are described rather than given as copy-paste-ready prompts, and KB 'ACQUIRE' steps are abstract directions, leaving it at 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A sequence is discernible (detect task type, scope, dispatch in parallel, then a verify pass), but it is laid out as bullets rather than an explicit numbered workflow, and the batch/delegated operations lack explicit validation checkpoints or a fix-and-retry feedback loop, which caps clarity at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The single file is organized into clear sections (role, when-to-use, strategies, scoping) but is monolithic with no signaled one-level-deep references, and no bundle files exist to offload detail, so it is 'some structure but could be better organized'.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete (both what and when), and distinctive, with a clear third-person trigger clause. Its weakest point is trigger-term coverage, which leans technical and misses everyday user phrasings.

Suggestions

Add natural user phrasings alongside the technical terms, e.g. 'when a workspace is too large to fit in context' or 'too many files for one pass'.

Consider listing the two output modes (summarize-and-index vs work distribution) in the description so users can recognize the skill from its outcomes.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'partition large workspaces (100+ files) into scoped subagent tasks' — matching the anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions; not 2 because it goes beyond a domain plus a single action.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('partition ... into scoped subagent tasks') and when ('when context is insufficient', '100+ files'), matching the anchor for clearly answering both what and when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords ('large workspaces', 'subagent tasks', 'context is insufficient') but misses common natural phrasings a user would actually say (e.g. 'too many files', 'context limit'), so it is not the full coverage of a 3.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — large-workspace partitioning via subagent delegation — with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
griddynamics/rosetta
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.