Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable body with complete YAML templates, concrete MCP invocation details, and a clear confirm-then-create workflow. Weaknesses are redundancy between the generic structure and deployment-type sections, filler in Performance Notes, and heavy inlining of template/reference material that should live in bundle files, with the sole external reference being a dangling path.
Suggestions
Move the per-deployment-type YAML templates and the artifact-source field reference into files under references/ (e.g., references/deployment-types.md and references/artifact-sources.md), keeping only the generic structure and one or two common examples inline in SKILL.md.
Fix or remove the dangling cross-skill reference '../../pipelines/create-pipeline/references/codebase-analysis.md' — it does not resolve from this skill's directory; either vendor the decision tree into this skill's references/ or reference a path that exists.
Trim the redundant generic 'Service Structure' Kubernetes block (duplicated by the 'Kubernetes Service' section) and replace the vague Performance Notes filler (e.g., 'Quality of service configuration is more important than speed') with the concrete connector-verification step inline in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with YAML templates, field lists, and MCP calls with no concept explanations, matching anchor 4 ('efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'). Not anchor 5 because the generic "Service Structure" block largely duplicates the Kubernetes deployment-type example, and "Performance Notes" contains filler like "Quality of service configuration is more important than speed". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Complete copy-paste YAML for each major deployment type (Kubernetes, NativeHelm, Kustomize, ECS, ServerlessAwsLambda), concrete MCP calls with exact parameters ("Call MCP tool: harness_create / resource_type: 'service'"), per-source artifact field lists, and error-code troubleshooting match anchor 5's 'fully executable; copy-paste ready'. Common cases are covered; only the rarer Ssh/WinRm/Azure types lack templates, which does not rise to a 'minor gap' under anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Instructions section (detect service type → detect artifact source → confirm with user → generate YAML → create via MCP) is clearly sequenced with a user-confirmation checkpoint and Troubleshooting error-recovery guidance, matching anchor 4. Not anchor 5 because validation ("Verify that referenced connectors exist before creating the service definition") sits in Performance Notes rather than being an explicit gated step in the workflow sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~265-line body inlines five full deployment-type YAML templates and a large artifact-source reference table that belong in separate reference files, and no bundle (references/, scripts/, assets/) exists. The single reference — "[codebase-analysis.md](../../pipelines/create-pipeline/references/codebase-analysis.md)" — points outside the skill directory to a path that does not resolve, i.e., a buried/dangling reference. This matches anchor 3 ('some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline') rather than anchor 4, whose 'references mostly clear' and 'content appropriately placed' do not hold. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |