Conciseness

The body is dense and free of concept over-explanation, but the same rules are restated repeatedly: the CD-on-CI-only rule appears in Interaction model items 11–12, the Phase 2/Phase 3b subsections, Performance Notes, and Troubleshooting ("User Chose CD on CI-Only Pipeline"), and "do not execute the pipeline" is repeated three times. The ~45-line, ten-subsection Troubleshooting section could be tightened or moved to a reference file. Mostly efficient, but noticeably could be tightened.

Actionability

Fully concrete guidance throughout: a complete copy-paste-ready SscaEnforcement YAML block, exact MCP call shapes with parameters (harness_update with resource_type/org_id/project_id/body, harness_list(resource_type="policy_set", org_id, project_id)), per-phase option ids in the wizard table, exact step identifiers (enforce_sbom, enforce_sbom_cd), and named validation-error remediations (DUPLICATE_IDENTIFIER, verifyAttestation shape). Examples cover the common CI, CD, and defaults cases.

Workflow Clarity

The wizard phases (0–10 plus 3b) are explicitly sequenced in a table with breadcrumbs, prerequisites are checked before configuration (SBOM existence, harness_list of policy sets), the user confirms before harness_update, and there is a feedback loop for validation errors ("read the API message, fix fields... retry") plus a Troubleshooting section with named error codes. Not a 4: checkpoints and error-recovery loops are explicit and comprehensive.

Progressive Disclosure

The two bundle references (references/interactive-wizard-flow.md, references/sbom-enforcement-step.md) are real files, clearly signaled, and one level deep, and cross-skill pointers (skills/create-sbom/references/...) are explicitly named. Not a 5: the large inline wizard phase table and the ten-subsection Troubleshooting section are content that arguably belongs in the existing reference files, and several referenced paths (cd-containerized-step-group.md, sbom-orchestration-step.md, entity-sbom.md) live outside this bundle, so navigation depends on sibling skills being installed.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ("Add an SBOM Policy Enforcement... step to an existing Harness pipeline to verify SBOM attestations and apply OPA SBOM policy sets", "may append a Deploy stage") with named step types, stage types, and registries (docker, ECR, GCR, GAR, ACR). Not a 5 because the Phase 3b implementation details ("service, environment, infra, containerized step group") are skill-internal process rather than capability, and "Only works with existing pipelines" repeats the opening phrase — padding the description rather than adding capability coverage.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("verify SBOM attestations and apply OPA SBOM policy sets" on CI/Security/CD stages of an existing Harness pipeline) and when ("Use when asked to enforce SBOM policies, add SBOM policy enforcement, verify SBOM attestation in pipeline, or block non-compliant components") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the 5-level anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-language triggers: "enforce SBOM policies", "add SBOM policy enforcement", "verify SBOM attestation in pipeline", "block non-compliant components", plus an explicit trigger-phrase list ("enforce SBOM, SBOM policy enforcement, SBOM policy step, verify SBOM policy, SscaEnforcement, add policy enforcement after SBOM") covering both plain-English and technical phrasings users would actually say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (Harness pipeline SBOM policy enforcement, with distinct SscaEnforcement/CdSscaEnforcement triggers) but minor overlap risk with closely related /create-sbom and /create-policy skills, since "verify SBOM attestation in pipeline" and other SBOM-keyed phrases could plausibly match the SBOM-generation skill. Not a 5; not a 3 because the enforcement-vs-generation distinction is stated.