Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-organized style guide rich with executable HCL examples, concrete commands, and a review checklist. Its main gaps are a duplicated terraform block and siloed validation that isn't woven into the generation workflow, plus a dangling reference to a non-existent SECURITY.md.
Suggestions
Remove the verbatim-duplicated `terraform {}` block in 'Version Pinning' (reference the earlier example or keep only one) and drop the opener that restates the description.
Integrate validation as an explicit final step in 'Code Generation Strategy' (e.g. step 6: run `terraform fmt -recursive` and `terraform validate`, fix and re-run on failure) to create a real checkpoint/feedback loop.
Either add the referenced `SECURITY.md` to the bundle (e.g. in `references/`) or inline its security guidance and drop the dangling reference, so navigation resolves.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), but the identical `terraform { required_version … required_providers … }` block is repeated verbatim in both 'Example Structure' and 'Version Pinning', and the opener restates the frontmatter description — tokens that do not earn their place, so it stops short of the 'every token earns its place' level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides numerous complete, executable, copy-paste-ready HCL examples plus concrete commands (`terraform fmt -recursive`, `terraform validate`) and named tools (tflint, checkov, tfsec), matching the 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step 'Code Generation Strategy', a review checklist, and validation commands exist, but validation is siloed in a separate section rather than appearing as an explicit checkpoint inside the generation workflow, fitting 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' rather than the integrated-feedback-loop level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized (not a wall of text), but the skill is a monolithic ~310-line single file and references a `SECURITY.md` that is not present in the bundle, so navigation is partly broken and the simple-skills (<50-line) exemption does not apply; this fits 'some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |