Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, jargon-consistent operational guide with concrete example questions, a diagnostic failure-mode section, and a verification-oriented closing, scoring uniformly at the 'good with minor gaps' level. Its main deductions are the redundant generic questioning-styles section and occasional principle-level phrasing instead of concrete steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with no padding and assumes Claude's competence throughout, but the 'Questioning styles' section re-explains standard interview types (open-ended, closed-ended, hypothetical, reflective, comparative) Claude already knows, which is trimmable. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | An instruction-only skill with largely concrete, executable guidance: quoted example questions, a cue-to-suspect-to-ask table, and a precise quantity protocol ('nine times in ten, under how long?'). A few sections remain at the principle level ('Ask the question whose answer could most change what the model will answer') rather than concrete steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear phase progression (early breadth, later unmet needs) is paired with an explicit error-recovery section ('When the interview goes wrong': symptom to corrective move) and a closing read-back verification. Minor gaps remain, e.g. when to transition from mapping to the closing read-back is implied rather than checkpointed. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill with no bundle and consistently well-organized, clearly headed sections covering choosing questions, moves, cues, quantities, failure modes, length levels, and closing. At ~85 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case, and the cue table or interview-length details could arguably live in references, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |