Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a tight, highly actionable walkthrough with complete code templates and a useful cheat sheet. Its only gaps are a missing explicit error-recovery loop in the workflow and the absence of any reference files for progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation feedback loop after the build/test steps (e.g. 'If llvm-lit fails, read the FileCheck diff, fix the pass or test, and re-run until green').
Consider moving the 'Quick reference' cheat sheet and/or 'Common mistakes' into a references/ file linked from the body, to give the overview a one-level-deep pointer and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: tables, code templates, and a cheat sheet with almost no prose padding, and it never explains concepts Claude already knows (e.g. what LLVM or a pass is). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready, complete code templates for header, implementation, registration, CMake, lit tests, and smoke tests, plus a concrete API cheat sheet covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–6 are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints (lit test in Step 5, smoke test in Step 6 with an expected outcome), but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop (e.g. 'if the build/test fails, fix and re-run'). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into clearly headed sections (Steps 0–6, Quick reference, Common mistakes) with no nesting, but no bundle/reference files are used so nothing is split out one level deep. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |