Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated multi-step workflow and a useful checklist. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: a large monolithic file where reference tables could be offloaded to a bundle file.
Suggestions
Move the large rename/move tables (Steps 5–7) into a references/ file (e.g. LLVM22-API-CHANGES.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim "Still works" / "(unchanged)" table rows that add no migration signal.
Consider adding a brief validation gate between Step 5 and Step 6 (e.g. rebuild after each category fix) to reinforce the fix→rebuild→verify loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean — tables of old→new mappings, commands, and a checklist assume Claude's LLVM knowledge; minor padding in "Still works" / "(unchanged)" table entries that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: concrete git/cmake/opt commands, before/after code snippets, and a copy-paste checklist covering the common migration cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–11 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (collect build errors in Step 2, run tests in Step 9, fix failures) and a final checklist, matching the anchor for clear sequences with feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single file, but ~215 lines with no bundle files and large inline reference-style tables (header moves, API renames, pass-name changes) that could be split into a reference file; the only cross-reference is to another skill (add-npm-pass), not to bundle material. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |