Conciseness

The body never explains what Figma is or how the tooling works conceptually; every sentence carries operational load (e.g. 'Every import happens at build time and freezes a local file with its source recorded under `.media/`, so renders never call Figma and re-running a command re-imports only what changed'). At ~51 lines covering six workflows, every token earns its place.

Actionability

The main flows are copy-paste ready — `npx hyperframes figma asset '<url or fileKey:nodeId>' [more refs] --format svg|png --scale 2 --description "<what it is>"`, `motionContextToDocs(raw, { selectorFor, repeat })`, `node <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/verify-motion.mjs --reference <export.mp4> --render <render.mp4> --crop WxH+X+Y` — but the connector-based fetch ('Fetch motion context for the parent frame in one recursive request') and the shader native-export step have no executable command, leaving minor gaps versus the fully-executable anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

The motion pipeline is a numbered sequence with an explicit validation gate and feedback loop ('fails under 15 dB ... A fail means fix the translation, not the threshold') plus a fallback for untranslatable tracks, and the component flow has error recovery ('an unknown token stays a literal marked `data-figma-unresolved`: import that library's tokens and re-import') alongside a hero-drift pixel check and a 401/403/429 error-remediation table. This matches the anchor-5 validate→fix→retry pattern; the storyboard section's lack of a verify step is the only gap, and it has explicit failure-mode and fallback rules instead.

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure: six clearly headed sections, and the one bundle reference (`scripts/verify-motion.mjs`) is real, one level deep, and invoked with its exact CLI. However the body also leans on an external conditional path (`../hyperframes/references/plugin-installation.md`) outside the skill's own bundle, and the dense storyboard/motion detail is all inlined with no further splitting — minor organization gaps versus the cleanly-split anchor 5.

Specificity

The description lists several concrete capability areas — 'rendered assets, brand tokens, components, storyboard frames as reconstructed motion (frames read as states, not slides), shaders and connector-assisted motion' — but delivers them as a noun list carried by a single verb ('Bring'), unlike the multi-verb anchor-5 examples, and 'shaders' slightly over-claims what the body handles via fallback-only native export. It sits noticeably above the anchor-4 midpoint but not fully at anchor 5.

Completeness

Both halves are explicit: the 'what' is concrete ('Bring Figma into a HyperFrames video - rendered assets, brand tokens, components, storyboard frames as reconstructed motion... shaders') and the 'when' gives concrete trigger phrases ('Use when the person pastes a figma.com link or asks to use a Figma design, frame, logo or brand'). This matches the anchor-5 example pattern exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

'Use when the person pastes a figma.com link or asks to use a Figma design, frame, logo or brand' gives good natural coverage (figma.com link, design, frame, logo, brand), but misses common Figma synonyms a user would naturally say such as 'prototype' or 'mockup'. Not a 3 — the terms present are natural and specific, not generic.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — importing from Figma into a HyperFrames video — with a distinct, unambiguous trigger ('pastes a figma.com link'). Virtually no other skill would trigger on these phrases; minimal conflict risk.