Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a strong, dense, actionable workflow: sequenced steps, executable code, explicit gates, and a clean one-level-deep reference structure with all referenced files present. It is slightly long with minor placeholder gaps and lacks a structured validate→retry loop, but overall highly usable.
Suggestions
Tighten the DCF section: the inline 'Quick skeleton' code overlaps references/dcf.md — either shorten the skeleton to a few key lines or rely on the reference to reduce length and redundancy (lowest dimension: conciseness).
Replace placeholder/comment hints ('# replace', '# pick by industry', 'tax_rate = ... # use effective if available') with concrete logic or a clear instruction so the code is fully copy-paste ready (lowest dimension: actionability).
Add a brief validate→fix→retry cycle for data-quality failures (e.g., when yfinance returns None for key fields) rather than only flag-and-note, to strengthen the feedback loop (lowest dimension: workflow_clarity).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and largely assumes Claude's competence — code skeletons, defaults tables, and gates are packed with signal — but it is quite long (300+ lines) with some redundancy (e.g., the 'Quick skeleton' DCF code overlapping content elaborated in references/dcf.md), leaving minor trim opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: copy-paste-ready Python for data pull, DCF, relative, and triangulation, plus a concrete detection-flow with shell probes and a decision table. Minor gaps — a few placeholders ('# replace', '# pick by industry') and tax_rate fallback hardcoded rather than computed — keep it just below fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight steps are clearly sequenced with explicit gates (a/b/c in the DCF), an error-handling table, and sanity checks; validation is present and mostly explicit. It falls short of 5 because recovery is described as flag-and-note rather than a structured validate→fix→retry loop, and the multi-method orchestration has a few implicit handoffs. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview (3-method summary + steps) with well-signaled one-level-deep references — dcf.md, relative_valuation.md, sotp.md, wacc_erp_rates.md — all verified to exist as real files, each surfaced exactly where its topic arises and consolidated again in a Reference Files section. Easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |